• BitSound@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is tilting at windmills. If someone has physical possession of a piece of hardware, you should assume that it’s been compromised down to the silicon, no matter what clever tricks they’ve tried to stymie hackers with. Also, the analog hole will always exist. Just generate a deepfake and then take a picture of it.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not at all. From what I understand of this article, it wouldn’t stop you from doing anything you wanted with the image. It just generates a signed certificate at the moment the picture is taken that authenticates that that particular image existed at that particular time. You can copy the image if you like.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          🙄

          Digital signatures are not nefarious. Quit freaking out about things just because you don’t understand them.

      • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Forgive the cynicism, but: free, for now.

        What happens when the company decides all of a sudden to lock the service behind a subscription pay wall?

        Do you still maintain rights to your photos when you use this service?

  • culprit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was wondering when crypto content would become a thing like this.