People really argue about which birds are the best birds, but everyone can agree that seagulls are the worst.
They may be the worst, but someone who kills out of annoyance needs to be on a watchlist.
You talk like a man who’s never been attacked by a wild turkey.
Turkeys are stupid and angry. I think the only bird less intelligent than a turkey would be a guinea fowl, but they have the edge of just being suicidally dumb. I’ve had a Guinea run away from my car and then back in front of it in confusion, but never have I had one openly charge my vehicle. I’ve had a turkey do that, though.
I haven’t. But also that line is from a song.
Wait. Are seagulls worse than black swans? Are they worse than Australian Magpies? I mean these surely got to be the top three worst birds, personally I’d prefer a seagull to a swan, but I’ve met enough magpie haters so I wouldn’t be so sure everyone agrees
Never seen neither of those, but I’ve seen enough seagulls to not be sad if one day they all be deleted off this fucking planet
Throw the Canadian Goose in that mix. That bird is simply evil.
Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs described them best. Rats with fucking wings.
I live by the bay of a freshwater lake with gulls so I call they baygulls
I love seagulls
Luv me chips. Hate gulls. Simple as.
So I turns around, and I sez…
I said seagull: Stop it now!
Hm ha hm hm ha
He should have eaten the seagull.
*shouldn’t have"
I think it was intentional
first off, in the politest way possible, fuck you
‘me chip’ isn’t correct either
‘simple as’… simple as what?
they’re not going for correct grammar, they’re phonetically spelling the accent and slang
This should be told to all seagulls… Is he also a Florida man?
Simple as that*
“Simple as” is british slang
It is my understanding that it is common in NZ/AUS to leave the “that” out which is implied.
It’s from an English dialect.
To expand further the implication is that the whole proposition is simple and ‘Simple As’ is the end of the conversation, much like ‘End of’ which likewise suggests that no further analysis is needed.
How the fuck are you going to define someone by a pension? Seems like a lot of assumptions and prejudice goin in that definition. Is Pension like a town or something too?