As the title states, how would you set it up? I’ve got an HP EliteDesk G5, what are the strengths and weaknesses of either:

  • ProxMox with one VM running TrueNAS and another VM running Nextcloud
  • TrueNAS on bare metal with Nextcloud running in docker
  • Some other setup

I’d like to be able to easily expand and backup the storage available to Nextcloud as needed and I’d also like the ability to add additional VMs/containers/services as needed

  • Tealk@rollenspiel.forum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I would clearly prefer Proxmox, which gives you the greatest possible freedom in terms of what else you want to do. Then a VM or LXC for each service.

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    LXC Linux Containers
    NAS Network-Attached Storage
    k8s Kubernetes container management package

    [Thread #263 for this sub, first seen 6th Nov 2023, 10:30] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Maybe you could install nextcloud in docker on a separate VM (I use Debian) and then mount a Truenas network share in docker.

    Trying to use TrueNAS for anything but a file share is not going to work well in terms of flexablity

  • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Personally I go with low resource box with lots of drives for a nas and a higher compute but low storage box for a hypervisor. That way the NAS storing all the bulk data uses as little power as it can and can just sit there doing the pretty well singular task of serving drives. Backup is all automatic via mirror raid and snapshots.

  • ___@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have TrueNAS Scale running inside of ProxMox, but I plan to replace it with a Turnkey system on top of an LXC instead.

    For as convenient as TrueNAS is, it is not a replacement for ProxMox. ProxMox is designed for business, and it shows in comparison. The logical layout, the backup options, the storage flexibility, etc.

    In comparison, TrueNAS feels more homelab hobby. For reference, I could see ProxMox on a business install with enterprise support. TrueNAS, I’m not so sure.