TL;DR: say hello to our friend u/ModCodeOfConduct, disguising threats behind feigned politeness, yet again!

  • boff@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe some malicious compliance is needed? If the moderators keep active in their private communities, it would meet the requirements of code of conduct.

    • Lvxferre@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Privating subs = mods get replaced. Reddit Inc. is already doing this.

      Instead I think that a better strategy is to restrict further and further the scope of the subreddit, while linking and feeding an alternative elsewhere. For example, if the subreddit is about cooking:

      • “From now on we don’t allow baking posts here. Go to foobar/c/cooking to discuss those.”
      • “From now on we don’t allow baking posts or mentions of brands. Go to foobar/c/cooking to discuss those.”
      • “From now on we don’t allow baking posts, mentions of brands, or recipes without veggies. Go to foobar/c/cooking to discuss those.”
      • etc.

      While perhaps retro-actively removing posts breaking the new rules.

      Still a form of malicious compliance, but I think that it’s more effective to divert Reddit traffic to another community also controlled by the same mod team. And it should be really hard for Reddit Inc. to say “no, you need to allow baking posts here!”, as it’s too sub-specific and Reddit Inc. is completely out of touch with the community.