• PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Why aren’t the poors having more workers??” - the same people continually reducing the status and security of the working class

    • vivadanang@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago
      • low wages
      • no unions
      • housing is either a lifetime’s savings for down payment on mortgage or a never ending escalator of rent fees
      • states taking reproductive rights away
      • states threatening contraception
      • climate change dooming the future
      • war - war in ukraine, war in palestine, war in africa, civil war being threatened by the chud down the street

      Gee Mr Wizard, why don’t millennials want babies instead of avocado toast?

  • Szymon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Gee, it’s almost like it’s important for the long term success of society to have systems in place that make sure it’s not a burden to create new people to take over for your generation after their bodies are too old and broken to keep working and society functioning.

    Then again, the decisions have already been made by the people with the power to make them, and technology/automation are in line to replace workers. They’ll be a little loud and problematic until the numbers naturally even themselves out, but we’ll be left with an enlightened society of capitalist asset owners being supported by a massive technological network.

    • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It would be a shame if a new Luddite movement came and broke the machines putting humans out of work they want to do.

      Or give us a universal basic income and let humans do what they want to do to make themselves happy while the machines do all the work.

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Why the fuck would I want to subject my own children to the inevitability of human suffering? I’m not going to make the same mistake my parents made.

    If the world collapses because there are no more children, I’ll consider it my greatest accomplishment before ending it all on my own terms.

  • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    “choosing”.

    Articles like this are not for you and me. These are written for investors.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Friend of mine wanted kids. Can’t afford it. Both her and her partner work full time, though money was too tight for them to feel comfortable. It’s heartbreaking, really.

  • M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    My wife finally are in a point where we can afford to have children, but we are kinda getting a bit old to have children. So we are also choosing the dual income no children life style,

    But a big part of that is our age and how long it took to get to a comfortable place financially.

    Now we want to focus on saving for a house and retirement.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Always so hilarious to see politicians trying to impove demographics and outlets wondering “why don’t we have kids” while absolutely 0 things are done to improve our financial situation.

    Capitalism will do everything, but last thing it will do is share profits with people.

  • vladmech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Living that DINK life and still having trouble keeping out of debt. I can’t imagine having to cover for kids, too.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      choosing

      Is doing so much heavy lifting in that headline.

      Might as well be “More Titanic passengers choosing life rafts to ocean liners”

  • ApeNo1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    As the 21st century began, human evolution was at a turning point.

    Natural selection, the process by which the strongest, the smartest

    the fastest reproduced in greater numbers than the rest,

    a process which had once favoured the noblest traits of man,

    now began to favour different traits.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Natural selection, the process by which the strongest, the smartest

      the fastest reproduced in greater numbers than the rest,

      That is a misunderstanding of natural selection. Natural selection means the most efficient ways to live in your ecological niche have been selected for.

      Sloths are not counter to natural selection. They’re not fast or smart or strong. What they are is well-adapted to live in their environment.