As in title. What’s your experience with it? If something isn’t executable, then it has to exploit vulnerability in order to run anything malicious. But does it happen often with mp4, mkv and other files like mp3 or epub?

I assume that if I use updated linux, then I’m mostly safe?

  • plexnose@geddit.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not about a media player ‘attempting to execute random code’ - an exploit is found which lets it run a command that it shouldn’t. You used to be able to jailbreak phones by loading a .pdf file that used an exploit to gain root privileges and execute code. It wasn’t a feature of the PDF reader. It was a bug that could be exploited when a specific string of characters was entered to effectively crash the pdf reader and let it run its own code instead.

    A txt could easily contain malware - any file could.

    • Pulp@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      True. This is something to worry when securing the network of a large corporation & governments. Not for the average pirate

    • miah@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      PDF is a complicated format, and the hacking vectors are often thanks to embedded javascript, or vulnerabilities in the parsing libraries.

      ‘avi’ is technically a container format, kind of like ‘zip’, it can contain more than video/audio.

      That said, I’ve been pirating movies since the mid 1990’s and haven’t gotten hacked through a .avi/.mkv/etc. The ‘bad stuff’ was always in a obvious .exe/.bat or some sort of executable, but sometimes named to exploit people, eg ‘foomovie.avi.exe’.

      If in doubt, run your videos using mplayer on Linux and not on Windows, most of that stuff tends to target the easier to exploit and more commonly deployed systems, eg Windows.