• agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Unless “we” change it via legislation, that’s never going to happen. Let’s explore how it would play out as an individual restaurant initiative:

    Restaurant raises staff wages, raises prices to cover the increase. Even if you disclose it on the menu, customers don’t care: they see prices 20% higher, they choose to eat somewhere with cheaper menu prices. This is frequently what happens when restaurants try to do that.

    If the restaurant increases server wages less than what they would make in tips, the servers will leave for another restaurant. The benefit of tips is that the harder you work, and more tables you take, the more money you make. Good servers can make $50+ an hour if they hustle.

    Source: 8 years experience in the industry.

    • AtariDump@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      The benefit of tips is that the harder you work, and more tables you take, the more money you make. Good servers can make $50+ an hour if they hustle.

      I shouldn’t be paying my server’s wage; the restaurant should.

      Name one other job (that isn’t in the food service industry) where the buyers subsidize the worker’s salary voluntarily.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Literally every other contractor. But that’s irrelevant to the point.

        This is the way it is. Whether or not it’s a good system, it’s the system which exists. Changing the system will require a transition. If that transition comes from individual restaurants changing their policy, they will have 1) staffing issues as no server will stay when they could make more elsewhere, 2) customer issues as customers will prefer restaurants with lower menu prices, even if the total is the same.

        This isn’t a value judgement, or a defense, this is a statement of fact. The only change that will stock would have to come from legislation. Societal systems have considerable inertia.