The mayor of Elyria has ordered a probe after the woman who lives at the home accused police of raiding the wrong house, an incident that she said left her baby with severe burns.

The mayor of Elyria, Ohio, has ordered an investigation after a woman alleged that police officers who raided her home had the wrong address and deployed flash-bang devices that sent her 1-year-old to the hospital with burns.

Police have offered a conflicting account of what happened Jan. 10, saying in a statement Friday that they had executed a search warrant at the correct address and the child did not “sustain any apparent, visible injuries.”

Courtney Price says audio from her Ring camera proves them wrong. In a clip shared exclusively with NBC News on Tuesday, someone can be heard saying “it’s the wrong house.” It is not clear who made the remark because the camera fell to the ground and went dark after police deployed the flash-bang devices.

    • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This isn’t better but they actual did knock, but then waited less than ten seconds before they used the ram, so they busted the door down as the resident was approaching the door.

      In fact I’d agrue it’s worse because they turned a (presumably) knock warrant into a defacto no knock by refusing to wait for a response. These cops clearly wanted to play storm trooper.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yup. Probably in an area where they knew a judge wouldn’t sign off on a no-knock warrant. So they just knocked once, then rammed the door anyways.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      Also I thought the SWAT stopped doing “breach and bang” systematically ? I guess their new doctrine isn’t much better if they still end up throwing grenades at babies, in the wrong house nonetheless

    • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      To be fair, what they thought he stole was weapons, and this headline insinuates that they knew it was the wrong house beforehand, while that doesn’t seem to be the case… Regardless, we shouldn’t be doing SWAT type raids on secondhand info, and I personally don’t think we should do them ever.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is America. Someone having weapons isn’t an emergency; it’s just a typical day. Cops only treat it as an emergency when they want an excuse to cosplay as commandos.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Raises new questions? No you dumb insincere assholes in the American media, we’ve been asking the same damn question and have had solid answers to why and how to fix this kind of bullshit for over a decade now.

    oh and

    Police have offered a conflicting account of what happened Jan. 10, saying in a statement Friday that they had executed a search warrant at the correct address and that the child did not “sustain any apparent, visible injuries.”

    Otherwise known as cops lied once again and they’ll get a tax payer paid vacation while they investigate themselves and found they did nothing wrong.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Otherwise known as cops lied once again

      Despite all the other problems (and believe me, I’m very, very strident in my criticisms of policing in the US), if it didn’t always ALWAYS come down to this, I could possibly begin to understand the “well it’s a really hard job we’re doing our best” defense.

      No, cops. You fuck up, and you lie about it. You got away with it for decades to centuries before there were cameras you couldn’t control everywhere. Don’t tell me about your integrity or about how I just don’t understand the job. Talk to me about those things when lies aren’t the go-to for police when shit hits the fan every. single. time.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        As a combat veteran it boils my blood that cops here aren’t held to ANY standard domestically while I’ve been in situations under fire where we had to wait for confirmation to fire back.

        Call me a commie but I think domestic beat cops shouldn’t be able to shoot at somebody easier than a soldier in a war zone can. 🤷

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I figured out this game about 15 years ago when I read an article about a police car in NYC running over someone who had the walk sign in a crosswalk. Within an hour, there was a statement that the person was at fault because they did not exercise needed caution–this was well before any sort of investigation could occur. The police simply lie and the media reports it as stated.

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    10 months ago

    IMO police rules of engagement should disallow use of any tactical equipment until they at least run into active opposition. There’s an innocent until proven guilty assumption built into the legal system, the police should also have a passive until proven violent assumption.

    The only reason a single mother and baby should ever be flash banged is if they are shooting at the police. With the technology today, they should be aware of who is going to be hit by a flash bang before it’s even thrown.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      10 months ago

      The only reason a single mother and baby should ever be flash banged is if they are shooting at the police. With the technology today, they should be aware of who is going to be hit by a flash bang before it’s even thrown.

      That, and there isn’t ever really a need to do raids in the first place.

      • repungnant_canary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        there isn’t ever really a need to do raids in the first place

        Exactly! There might be a reason to be ready for a raid, for example if there’s a strong suspicion that someone’s heavily armed and might attack. But you don’t start acting offensively until you’re 200% sure that someone poses an immediate and serious threat.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          They’ll use the teeniest justification to play soldier. Many of these raids are simply to catch someone on stuff like probation violations or unpaid fines, yet they act like they’re trying to capture an international hitman.

      • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Eh…raids are necessary sometimes. Just…not 99% of the time these fucks do them and, in the end, they should be done by people who are…you know…educated and competent.

          • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            I can’t tell if you’re being snide with that comment, but yes. That should absolutely be the first step.

            • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              and if they don’t…yeah. raids might be necessary. I really get all the anti cop shit here…because our cops are absolute shit and most of them need to be just be thrown away for life. But this website acts like society would just suddenly behave if the cops went away. No more crime, no need to ever pursue people. No need to ever raid anyone’s home because nobody in history has ever done anything bad enough that they need to be forced to leave their home to face prosecution.

              Again…I fucking get it. I hate our police in this shithole country but the answer is not no police ever no raids ever no arrests ever. The answer is massive fucking reform of our entire god damn system starting with EXTREMELY harsh punishment’s for everyone involved in shit like this article.

              • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                If someone barricades themselves in their home, why not just wait them out? Cut off power & water, couple days max.

                • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  And if they have people in there they are threatening? Ah, well. They kill them its whatever right?

                  Again, I’m very sorry, but yes…some times society is going to need police. we just need to fix the system because our current usage of the police is completely fucked.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      disallow use of any tactical equipment until they at least run into active opposition

      Sure, but baby steps. How about we start with “disallow lethal force until they at least see or hear a weapon.”

      /s but also true

  • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    10 months ago

    Is this the same baby that got flash banged a few years ago and the family is still trying to get justice for what happened? Or is this another baby that got flash banged? Either way, it’s fucking disgusting and outrageous!

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 months ago

    I want to see a new version of CSI in which they depict police doing shit like this that the unsuspecting public are dealing with and not the super heroes it tries to be written as.

    • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It is a tremendous amount more difficult to make a police show without the cooperation of actual police. They only help if you portray them acceptably positive. Like B99 is about as critical as they can get I think.

      • kureta@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The Rookie on the other hand is almost an ad for the police.

        • Sagifurius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You don’t even need to know Dick Wolf is a big shot Republican to realize how Law & Order is basically fascist copaganda.

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, I love the show because it’s entertaining and Nathan Fillion is amazing, but it’s 100% blatant copaganda. They don’t even try to hide it.

          • kureta@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            That show is my guilty pleasure. At least I am not giving them my money, if you know what I mean 🏴‍☠️🦜

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe Law and Order?

      “Yeah so this perp got away while we raised the wrong house and we just lost a multi-million dollar lawsuit for flash-banging the neighbours baby. Also another perp just walked because we failed to follow due-process and violated his rights”

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The Hayes Code probably still blocks this, even if it’s not enforced. Part of it was that producers of TV and movies could never portray the police in a negative light.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Gosh I looked it up and confirmed. I had actually thought it was law. In any case, that set us back for generations and is surely at least partially responsible for the rampant NIMBYism that is ruining the country–people don’t have the capacity to recognize these things for what they are.

          • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Fun fact - the Hays Code was set up to preempt real government censorship. If Hollywood hadn’t started censoring itself at the time it’s possible that the federal government would have. Some city and state governments were already doing it, and SCOTUS had ruled that movies were not art and that somehow made them not subject to the First Amendment.

  • gearheart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Apparently we now live in a world where toddler abuse is more acceptable than basic reproductive health care…

  • Crikeste@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    10 months ago

    American police put a child in the hospital, but refuse to acknowledge it had been hurt in any way, shape or form.

    Typical of those murderous thugs.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    cops are paid liars. they are legally allowed to, and encouraged to lie. they work closely with district attorneys, who would be the ones to prosecute them if they lie. that is why you can never trust a police officer.

    sorry guys, it is the nature of your shitty job.

    • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      A cop would pretty much never be prosecuted for lying, it’s perfectly legal in the US for them to lie their asses off to witnesses and suspects alike. Part of the reason we have a such a problem with innocent people being imprisoned over false confessions.

      • XRchiver@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, because nobody notable has realized American cops as organizations were founded to be slaver patrols and if you were white and tried to protect their targets they would KILL you. I’m not saying my own country is perfect, but when the corruption rate among American police is claimed to be 98% and the corruption rate of the RCMP (yes, the Mounties) is claimed to be 0.02%? I’m literally waiting to defend myself in court and I will at least say the cops involved were fair. You know who originally the RCMP was founded by? They’re an offshoot of the UK’s royal bodyguards, the beefeaters, and as silly as that might sound, somehow it works.

        Canada has a relatively shitty mental health system but seriously, at least there’s a way to sue, convict or discredit corrupt doctors. Cops can’t be allowed to be corrupt, this is only going to be solvable if there’s a unified and violent citizen’s revolt. Go out there and pretend to be peaceful, then murder all the cops with extreme prejudice and without waiting for direct provocation when they show up and anyone who survives continues to kill police on sight until the fucking US Government gets it through their fucking heads that when the “police” are a criminal syndicate and former slaver you get fucking anarchy, a “system” of “government” that I am under no delusion is capable of producing anything of value. The government doesn’t want anarchy? Stop fucking oppressing people and the people won’t need to threaten you to get you to be a tolerable person. Being legal and rational means nothing if the system is rigged against justice.

        Now if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got to try and get a judge to begin an investigation into an entire psychiatric ward as well as an unrelated ex-psychiatrist, because thanks to years of malpractice my life is irrecoverably ruined and I fucking hate everyone.

        • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The RCMP has its own history of suppressing and murdering indigenous people. Colonialism, apartheid and genocide are some of the main reasons the RCMP exist.

          That said, I agree that the RCMP are much better on virtually every measurable metric, as is policing in Canada in general.

          • XRchiver@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Oh, for sure. I am still f-ing pissed about McGill covering up that they experimented on kids. I was personally screwed out of a proper childhood because of RCMP and Social Services corruption, and I’m about as white-looking as any half-Colombian, half-Ukrainian can get including accent and mannerisms, I have no doubt that what those poor women said McGill did to their children was really what happened, that the full details were unimaginably horrifying, and I honestly feel like the University should be forced to shut down for doing such a thing at the full expense of those who were profiting from the University as running their business or investing in a business.

            I think I know why I never liked Westerns. Even at 5 years old, discriminating against natives never sat right with me. Sometimes I feel like I have no country, even though my family isn’t currently being oppressed and even my grandfather lived his whole life here, because so many things happen here in Canada that go against everything I was told this country is supposed to be that I never really became a “Canadian”. I value the ideal, but I refuse to be blinded and I cannot deny that Canada has failed to uphold its own values so much that if not for the UK having been in control until the 60s I would have already written us off as not even trying.

            On that note, I get that racial issues are not as clear as they seem in the US. White plantation owners and most of their descendants have acted like greedy assholes but " white" = / = white and even white = / = racist, and while I get life as a black American sucks, stealing from even other black neighbours is not okay (though it should be noted that intraracial crime - against those who are categorized with you for whatever trait or excuse outsiders invent - is universally more common than interracial crime) by the victim’s standards or by the standards of any fair-judging outsider.

            The point being, I don’t think much of America is salvageable, but you have to realize you’re doing far better from being exposed to the need to discuss it than many Europeans feel they are towards Muslims and Roma (“gypsies”, though it would be more understanding to remember that they exist because Rome didn’t collapse in a day and not owning land is extremely financially debilitating in Europe) considering that despite what those plantation owners claim, slavery in some form has been legal since 1776 and has only been restricted and not banned for, well…

            When slavery was “banned” after the American civil war, it was indeed banned and reparations to be given to former slaves… For two days or something upon which Lincoln was assassinated and his vice president reversed it all (presumably while meraphorically twirling his moustache, since true bigots who are sure they’ve done no wrong all seem to think like a spiteful Disney villain) like the scumbag the VP apparently was. Slavery proper was not banned until 1942 (as a wartime PR move) and everything from sundown laws to private prisons has kept a form of forced labor, especially forced on disadvantaged persons, in use in America. But that being said…

            Canada has “only” been attempting to move away from the UK for 80-ish years and I still think we can get over spitefulness instead of getting stuck in intergenerational feuds. America hasn’t even reached that point yet, as far as I’m concerned the US is well-prepared for the day private prisons are outlawed.

            I’m angry because I think we can succeed if not for people that only ever seem satisfied when they can toy with the fate of an individual like capitalism is literally how it was portrayed in Mun Mun (terrible book, IMO but in some sense I feel like “littlepoor” has always described me) and the kind of condescending pretentious “visionaries” of the Solarpunk genre…newsflash, vegan organic homegrown space Amish, you’re ableist if you think anyone with Aspergers/Autism/whatever my condition should be called is going to consider your “unplugged” world desirable, especially without my pharmaceutical psychiatric medications which would leave me not just angry and bitter but foaming at the mouth with enough rage to go around burning down every civilization that tries to rebuild after the loss of the internet and video games)… and people keep trying to prevent that from happening by encouraging discrimination by everyone against everyone else. Everyone else that cares this much about the way the world works tends to be not just insane (I’m saying this as someone who is already mentally unstable) but arrogantly so.

            I just want to see the world get better, and I feel like everyone else that cares about how humans progress only cares how that will benefit them personally. Of course I have personal values and selfish reasons, but this isn’t a high school and I have to know better than to propose anything that is global or national in scope unless it also benefits as many people as possible and screws not one person over because the means always must justify the ends, not the other way around. I’ve tried sites like Change.org but the fact is that when it comes to fixing the world I refuse to work with someone who clearly exclusively cares about their own interests. Homeowner’s ASSociations and narcissists don’t get to have a say over the individual right to do something that is actually beneficial in my hypothetical near-utopia, and that spinelessness has been enraging me by screwing me over and over for the past 7 years. I get screwed, I ask someone to help, and in most cases they can’t but even when they can they won’t because they’d lose something.

            I have a game console, a OneXPlayer. Custom preorder with the exclusive nametag. It’s my prized possession.

            I’d give it up as fast as I could if my option was to save it from a fire or save a child from a fire. All I ask is that when heroism is within easy reach, that people grab onto it for dear life. It might not be only their own dear life that they save by doing so, and if someone can’t live with that knowledge, then pretending you/I/they don’t remember a child’s haunting cries of pain means they’re a coward. If you have kids and can’t afford to lose them, I get it, but this is a Millennial talking. I don’t have kids and neither do “they” in many cases, but from what I’ve seen people honestly seem to believe that kids dying is “normal”.

            Tell a 10 year old that kids dying is just how things are, and watch how fast they decide on some level that adulthood is no different from any other inner party. Unfortunately, none of the world’s many other activists had to live with a foster mother because of illegal conduct by the Ministry of Children and Families. Yeah, sure, Ministers of " Truth" and “Plenty” and “Love”, you just want to Atlas Shrug off to some private island…

            Sorry for the rant. Thanks for having a good faith argument despite my temper, you’re clearly living up to your username!

    • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      To be fair, it was a former address of the suspect, so it’s not like they read it wrong, it just was outdated. Doesn’t excuse this shit though.

  • 𝕯𝖎𝖕𝖘𝖍𝖎𝖙@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    no new questions. all cops are bastards. surprised more people don’t understand. they need the cops to beat them bloody and senseless before they may consider not backing the blue.

    I don’t support the police because I am morally opposed to domestic violence and pedophillia.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 months ago

      Worse: it turns out that the police don’t actually solve crimes–the clearance rate drops year after year. Their only real function is to have someone sitting in a parked police car outside of some place while the officer plays on their cell phone all night. The only way the police solve crimes is by witnessing them, otherwise they can be used as an in-place deterrent. Outside of that, they have very little use.

  • Kalkaline @lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    So if it wasn’t the police action that caused the burns, what did? It’s an easy question to answer: it was the police action. The pre-existing conditions had nothing to do with them picking the wrong house and burning a kid.

  • Rooskie91@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Raises new questions,” no the fuck they did not. It raised the same question it raises every time; why are these clowns allowed to do this bullshit with 0 accountability?

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s kinda fucked up, but Sanders i think explained it well. We need increased funding so there’s higher salaries to attract better people.

      I bet we could claw back a lot of money for that without increasing funding though if we stopped buying military surplus.

          • Sagifurius@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Sure, but thee culture has to change first, the recruitment ads are so tone deaf, they really don’t realize it’s because decent people want nothing to do with these organizations anymore. I’d suggest no longer allowing high level management to have ever been cops, but maybe defense attorneys or any sort of lawyer who has never been a prosecutor. It’s been done before, PM Stephen Harper got so mad at the RCMP Superintendent he put a lawyer in charge, first time a non cop had been put in. They lost their minds over it.

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s pretty much like what happened with the military. People are no longer enlisting because the benefits aren’t there and people who enlisted and were screwed over are telling family and friends not to enlist.

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Oh for sure, it needs to be a twofold effort. We need good, decent people to become cops, and we need leadership that is committed to changed policies.

              I think it makes a lot of sense actually to remove all current police from leadership. We can follow the military model and have a civil police chief, like a mayor or city planner.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nah, police commonly earn in the $150,000 to $200,000 range because of overtime and powerful unions.

        • OneThere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Can you provide sources from this? I’m genuinely curious, the highest I’ve heard was $80,000 and it was a campus department with endowment funding.

          Also, I wouldn’t count overtime as part of the salary. Having to work that much is going to put extra stress on you, make you irritable, wear you down, etc. and result in turnover.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s because NIMBYs are people without any sort of compassion or empathy for other humans. They only want the scary people who want their stuff to stay away and don’t care what the damage is in the process of that.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      If only they all had the new Apple AR helmet thing, a tragedy like this wouldn’t have happened!