• echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    how is the “commercial” avenue supposed to make profit if nasa isn’t funding it. and if it can’t, isn’t it just a government program?

    the dead end of commercial space is that it can only function as a factor of government work. it’s not a viable industry by itself.

    you can see this tale play out time and time again in other industries that have had the same problem, it doesn’t end well, it ends badly.

    also you don’t need to do the big text

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      how is the “commercial” avenue supposed to make profit if nasa isn’t funding it. and if it can’t, isn’t it just a government program?

      NASA is not the only entity that send things into orbit.

      the dead end of commercial space is that it can only function as a factor of government work. it’s not a viable industry by itself.

      SpaceX does not seems to only rely on government orders.

      True, NASA helped (well, it is an understatment) SpaceX, but now it could capitalize on it if the costs are the one @partial_accumen@lemmy.world pointed out.