George Carlin Estate Files Lawsuit Against Group Behind AI-Generated Stand-Up Special: ‘A Casual Theft of a Great American Artist’s Work’::George Carlin’s estate has filed a lawsuit against the creators behind an AI-generated comedy special featuring a recreation of the comedian’s voice.

  • Tyfud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Building those isn’t illegal. Using them to make a profit without consent is. The law is very clear here. This is what is at issue here.

    • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Right so every single song, every use of Frank Sinatra’s voice on YouTube to cover songs is wildly illegal, yes? They have ads, they’re doing it for profit. The people who made the special didn’t sell access to it so how’d they make money? Same way I’d imagine.

      • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        those the use ai for it, yes actually. in fact, if we’re following the letter of copyright law, almost every meme is technically illegal.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          This is the best argument I have ever heard for getting rid of copyright law. It can’t be followed even if you want to.

        • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Okay then let’s focus on impressionists. Grapple with that for a minute because you seem to be avoiding it. If someone does a stand-up special they wrote and did a highly accurate impression of George Carlin, why is that illegal?