The administration of US President Joe Biden refuses to transfer long-range ATACMS missiles to Ukraine, despite requests from Kyiv and pressure from US lawmakers.

  • Haakon@lemmy.sdfeu.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m guessing the US arsenal of ATACMS missiles is rather limited and they have their own reasons for not making it smaller, which they can’t go into detail about. Frustrating, but understandable.

    • stevecrox@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The best theory I have seen is the Biden administration is trying to ‘manage’ the conflict. A belief they can dictate levels of aid to determine a geo politically satisfactory outcome.

      Concerns around unmanaged escalation made sense but the UK has been pretty focussed on methodically moving up the escalation ladder to demonstrate Russia won’t resort to nuclear strikes (Brimstone, Challenger 2 tanks, setting up the F16 coalition, Storm Shadow, etc…).

      The USA expects China to be the next conflict zone, that is a naval/air situation where ATACM’s can’t be used. Suffering a shortage of ATACM’s in the near term isn’t really an issue especially if you’ve already put in place contracts to address the gap.

    • snakesandcoffee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      IMO it’s also about not looking like the boss of NATO – a lot of tankies in Europe like to complain that they’re just puppets.