• Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, does not believe in cryptocurrencies, calling them a vehicle for scams and a Ponzi scheme.
  • Torvalds was once rumored to be Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, but he clarified it was a joke and denied owning a Bitcoin fortune.
  • Torvalds also dismissed the idea of technological singularity as a bedtime story for children, saying continuous exponential growth does not make sense.
    • leanleft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      POS does not consume resources.
      This goes to show how low-effort the criticism campaigns are.
      However… all cryptos have their health tied to bitcoin which is a large energy consumer. So the point is actually still very true (due to some other reason).

    • Ozymati@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think both have their uses. A true state backed cryptocurrency used interchangeably with physical cash could be quite useful. Crypto as it is now not so much.

      AI has a bunch of useful applications in medicine, manufacture, research, monitoring… But where we see it is language models, art remixes, and deep fakes.

      • Captain Janeway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nah it’s literally a waste of physical resources. Crypto currency is a waste of fossil fuels. AI has its functions at least.

        • jabjoe@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Proof of stake uses a load less than proof of work.

          Be really good if currencies could go in and out of crypto. Could cut out a lot of middle men.

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            again, what use does it serve over traditional banking?

            even PoS requires a lot of resources in comparison, for a system that literally exists to funnel money to a smaller group of people

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I literally can’t transfer money to Kazakhstan without paying $50 for a wire.

            • jabjoe@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Advantages of cash and digital, without the swings of raw crypto. Also leaving the ability to usefully manipulate your country’s currency.

              Crypto means easy, open payment systems. No gatekeepers like WorldPay.

              • orrk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                like any true Liber-crypto-bro-tarian, your understanding of crypto is only undercut by your understanding of economics

                • jabjoe@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Manipulating currency is a useful tool. If you don’t think so, that makes you more liberian than me.

                  Like many here, I’m big into open source, and card payment systems are an issue. Crypto is one solution to that. Crypto has advantages, but it falls down as a currency because of blind faith in the invisble hand.

            • jabjoe@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              From what I found, and varies due to values/date, looks like a PoW transaction is about 2+ million times more energy than traditional banking. PoS is over 1000 times less than PoW, so about 2+ thousands times traditional banking. But transitional banking has other problems. For one, the market of payment is stitched up. Not like openness of a crypto currency.

              • n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Plus the hardware needed for each person atop the extra power useage.
                Not worth it when May already feels like Aug

                • jabjoe@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Everyone has hardware enough already. Your phone is perfectly good enough. For tills it will be easier to implement. No nonsense with a card machine and things like WorldPay and whole locked down PC. The hardware and platform wouldn’t matter.