• vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I read through it for the details.

      It was net negative, requiring 2MW of power to maintain hydrogen plasma in a state analogous to fusion. The major achievement of this particular experiment was doing so without energies equivalent to a fusion reaction damaging the containing assembly.

      It was purely a test/demonstration of the containment of fusion-like conditions.

        • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          2 days ago

          You need to be the right amount of high to properly understand fusion. Too far either way, and it doesn’t make sense.

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Eh, fusion isn’t that complicated. You push things together and heat them up until they get even hotter on their own. That’s all that’s happening.

        • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Seems like the person wants to learn something, but with zero effort. (i.e. won’t read the article; and certainly won’t look for additional context or information.) So maybe it would be better to post the question into an AI chatbot. You can just ask whatever question, and get some plausible but possibly-bullshit answer; then feel good for satisfying your curiosity.

        • brad_troika@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I haven’t read the original comment and don’t know anything about how conversations work but would it not be easier to Google chatgpt?