• prinzmegahertz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can you elaborate on this? I use logseq as an information dump and use tags and hashtags to associate the individual entries with a certain topic. I love that i do not have to think about the file structure (where do i have to put it?) and instead can just write it down immediately.

    E.g: had a meeting with #name with regards to #project Z. We have a set of new requirements that need to be implemented in by Q3 2025….

    Would this be significantly different in obsidian?

    • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      With Obsidian, you don’t have to use folders. I’m generally of the opinion that having a tool is better than not having access to it. Tags and Folders are just an option to use. Fundamentally Logseq and Obsidian otherwise can be very similar.

    • artificialfish@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah Logseq is actually a much better knowledge management tool than obsidian. It’s literally built for that, whereas obsidian requires you to force structure onto it.