• Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pit bulls are indeed disproportionately mistreated & improperly trained, far more than any other breed of dog. They’re the breed of choice for drug dealers and gangsters in the US, and account for the vast majority of dogs seized by police at dogfighting operations.

    So your response… is that Pitbulls make up 66% of attacks… out of TENS OF MILLIONS of dogs (encompassing hundreds of thousands of attacks)… is that they’re all drug dealers dogs?

    Here… let’s try this again…

    Pick any month you want… But I’ll link 2 examples…

    https://old.reddit.com/r/BanPitBulls/comments/tuyivl/april_2022_list_of_pit_bull_attacksfatalities/
    https://old.reddit.com/r/BanPitBulls/comments/102buat/january_2023_list_of_pit_bull_attacksfatalities/

    Let me know how many attacks you had to scroll by in order to find even one that was “drug related”. If you get anything higher than 1:9 ratio (10% that they’re drug related)… I’ll back off my argument and completely support you that it must be the owners.

    In fact, pit bulls that have a reputation for being unaggressive

    This isn’t a fact… it’s a well known fact that they were trained to fight… period. Definitionally that’s “aggressive”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pit_bull

    The start of the whole breed is literally to fight.

    The term has been used since at least early 20th century.[17][3] It is believed all dogs that are now classified as pit bulls descend from the British bull and terrier, which were first imported into North America in the 1870s.[6][7] The bull-and-terrier was a breed of dog developed in the United Kingdom in the early 19th century for the blood sports of dog fighting and rat baiting, it was created by crossing the ferocious, thickly muscled Old English Bulldog with the agile, lithe, feisty Black and Tan Terrier.[6][7] The aggressive Old English Bulldog, which was bred for bear and bull baiting, was often also pitted against its own kind in organised dog fights, but it was found that lighter, faster dogs were better suited to dogfighting than the heavier Bulldog.[6][7][8] To produce a lighter, faster more agile dog that retained the courage and tenacity of the Bulldog, outcrosses from local terriers were tried, and ultimately found to be successful.[6][7][8]

    Now I’ll admit that Wikipedia isn’t the end all be all… But this is well cited… and well known.

    Also… adding this study in because I can and because it really doesn’t jive with your statements. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34100808/

    I don’t know of a lot of 6-12 year olds that hang out with drug dealers. But even given that “some” might have… The study DID control for demographics.

    • strobel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wasn’t implying that they’re all drug dealers’ dogs… the point I was making is that the breed is heavily favored by criminals & associated groups that desire an aggressive dog. These groups influence pit bull breeders, who in turn select for aggression, but these same breeders also sell to people who don’t associate with such groups and might be unaware of these breeders’ practices.

      When I say aggression, I usually mean aggression specifically towards people, which seems to be peculiarly intense in pit bulls. Aggression towards other dogs is a given for any dogfighting breed.

      I didn’t say pit bulls have a reputation for being unaggressive… did you even bother to read what I actually said? I said ‘pit bulls’ that have such a reputation are unlikely to actually be purebred pitbulls, since one would expect modern purebreds to be aggressive, and this might include the dogs I’ve met that I assumed were pit bulls.

      I’m not sure what the point is of the last study you linked.