If your love letter isn’t given in the form of highly obfuscated C, is it really a love letter? I don’t know, but what I do know is that I love you! <3
If your love letter isn’t given in the form of highly obfuscated C, is it really a love letter? I don’t know, but what I do know is that I love you! <3
Mind melds are like unprotected sex. Fine to be done with a trusted partner, not something you want to do a lot with randos
This whole message reads like “we don’t actually care but we have to say that we do 😉🙂↕️”
It’s literally as literal as literally
Seriously what’s with the spelling of the nicknames lol that seems new for him but now he does it all the time
Party of “free speech” ಠ_ಠ
*at least I’m safe inside my mind *
Why not password protect the keys (ala Linux ssh / gpg symmetric encryption for local storage of PPK)
Then the problem is with privacy laws that allow abuse and poor regulation, not with more capable cars.
It’s more a question of money than feasibility. I’m pretty sure a couple manufacturers already have basic capabilities similar to this
We created laws to require seat belts, maybe it’s time we create laws that require the manufacturers to install tech to detect kids and pets left in hot vehicles and alert the authorities or at the very least sound an alarm.
BuT wE hAvE jOuRnAlIsTiC iNtEgRiTy. AlSo FuCk DaVe SiRoTa
Half the time I look on stack overflow it feels like the answer is irrelevant by todays standards
I’m going to go against the crowd and say that while I think it’s a good move to make it official non competes were effectively already declared unenforceable via the court system. It’s rarely used for the average worker unless something truly fucky was going on and the courts would usually side with the employee no matter what unless something truly fucky was going on.
They also offered to “swap” her for the lot next door. F that, they should offer to buy it from her for fair market value
Should he take the deal, Weisselberg would admit to committing perjury during his October testimony in the fraud trial. In exchange, he would not have to be a witness against Trump in the hush-money trial, which is scheduled for March.
I will caveat that I’m not familiar with the case details at all, but my reading of that suggests that because of the deal he will not be testifying against trump, not that he will have to as part of the deal.
Tl;DR: a key witness that was set to testify against trump in his hush money case might not testify because of a separate deal for his possible perjury
I demand the government force this private company to provide me free speech.
That’s a great distinction, I’m gonna start stealing that.
Some people aren’t anti establishment, they are anti-not-my-establishment. You can’t call yourself anti establishment if you just don’t like the current one.
AI is cool. AI research is valuable. AI has the power to be a transformative technology.
Corporate AI hype for tech fueled neofeudalism is not cool. Commodification of AI is not valuable. LLMs will never substantively change the world.