a group of persons or particular persons for political purposes

A group such as healthcare CEOs, and the wealthy in general?

Not that I think he did it. But terrorism doesn’t have to be directed at the public at large.

Russian asset says what

All of that to fund a self-granted $400 million purchase of shitty falling apart Cybertrucks by the government.

They made huge inroads chasing the incel community. The left wants to dismiss actual young male issues because men have historically had the upper hand, but there are actual things causing hardship for the, and being repeatedly told to suck it up because someone who looks like them didn’t have those problems does not keep them in your corner.

Already mentioned? It happened already. They’re there. It took them only 2 weeks to get to operating concentration camps.

Essentially, directly accessing and modifying any system you don’t have authority over meets the bar for legal action.

So exactly the doge traitors are doing…

Their games were an advertisement for their game engine. Cryengine

They don’t care about doing things properly.

Announcing an investigation is like the simplest way you can pander to a group.

I could do it right now.

This way they can distract the idiots while they steal their social security, and all their identity and medical information off government servers.

The courts claimed they the courts couldn’t, but still have themselves the option to judge what was and wasn’t.

The courts later deciding that the president can just ignore the courts would be a bunch of power hungry dipshits completely removing their own power. It would be very dumb if them to do, even from the perspective of people who only care about themselves

Funny joke, but California’s economy is waaaay bigger than Denmark’s. CA is like the 5th largest in the world. Denmark is like 37.

Defying court orders is not part of the presidential duties.

Well this has been previously tested.

“More likely” would imply frequency of false information to overall tweets. Which would be split by political leaning already. The numbers of each side wouldn’t matter much in that case

There’s two halves of the company which are currently buying for control with one another

Right wing once again proving they’re the real snowflakes.

They will absolutely NOT return it to its open source mission. Why bother lying? This is the least believable group to even try making that statement

Not even gonna try to pretend it isn’t ethnic cleansing…

This question was about NATIVE LINUX ONLY games. Not just supporting it…

It’s still an argument, given that this historically wasn’t the case. And Mac used to have a bigger share of the pie. Do they even make Mac only games anymore?

But those numbers pretty much prove my point. Unless you’re already set up to be making games specific to a system, there’s no point in starting from scratch to only name something for 1-2% of the market.