Chill? I’m not heated. Clearly it was a misunderstanding, that’s why I explained it. I didn’t mean any disrespect.

No… Because I’m only referring to one post.

He’s wrong anyway, the green party isn’t a threat to any of the parties, but it’s designed to shape off 1-3% off the democratic vote to help republicans.

I’ll break it down for you. The first part of the post literally says this:

the green party isn’t a threat to any of the parties

And then the very next part of the same sentence is:

but it’s designed to shape off 1-3% off the democratic vote to help republicans

Which is exactly what I pointed out. It starts by saying the green party isn’t a threat and then gives the exact reason why it is a threat.

Are you saying that something helping the republicans isn’t a threat to democrats? Or are you saying it’s not enough to help because you’ve already forgotten the lesson from 2000?

Tell that to Al Gore.

No, that commenter literally said they’re not a threat and then gave the exact reason the green party is a threat to democrats.

You said it’s not a threat and then gave a reason it is actually a threat.

Also, being a fascist seems to really lead to violence.

Good thing they ended up doing the sensible thing.

I bet that second map would look dramatically different if it was sightings per capita.

Trump said he would create a government position just for him. He would also probably get some easier contracts and less oversight with SpaceX.

From my understanding California already had the red tape and funding figured out for it too. But they paused it because they wanted to look into the vaporware loop.

You’re both right.

This bot is cool, but the post it makes is way too long. It takes up over half my screen when scrolling on my phone.

Not in Texas.

I would agree with that. Commercial pilots are forced to retire at 65, why not politicians and judges?

The L? I didn’t realize this was a competition…

Nice conspiracy theory.

I’m listening to what the FBI are saying. You’re free to come up with whatever conspiracy you want to though.

Yes, because that’s where the evidence leads. I do tend to form my interpretations of things based on evidence.

Now you’re back peddling. Maybe you should actually say what you mean instead of leaving it up to interpretation.