This reminds me of an NPR podcast from 5 or 6 years ago about the people who get paid by Facebook to moderate the worst of the worst. They had a former employee giving an interview about the manual review of images that were CP andrape related shit iirc. Terrible stuff
https://youtu.be/1jmNzlTd09E?si=5w486YFlK4IbqpmK
Watch this^^^^^^
There are different levels of multiverse that are logically possible with our current understanding of physics.
It’s incredible to think about.
Source for all that please, I’m interested.
Even so, this feller apparently has 100TB seeding perpetually… There’s no way 1 movie equals that traffic.
It’s just an anecdote about the other extreme for the sake of having both sides in the comments since I happened to be someone that it really happened to
Meanwhile I went to school one day as a teen and had left the torrent up by accident seeding and 4 days later my isp called my parents saying that there was a huge fine coming my way if I didn’t cut it out. The isp was super small so the company they were the end user and they were nice enough to give us a heads up. The notice said something like 25,000 on it.
This is confidently incorrect.
The real answer you were looking for was PHEV.
The fuck I am, part 91 isn’t a common carrier
Please point to a 14 cfr reg that states that being buckled must be in a seat. 14 CFR 121.311 outlines 121 carriers and seat, harnesses, etc.
Please pay special attention to the fact that every time a place to sit is mentioned it says SEAT OR BERTH. There is no requirement for it to be a seat.
Of particular note is that the FAA says “an approved seat or berth.” There has not been an explicit exclusion of “non seats”. Meaning that any airline can configure a cabin as they see fit and if they can convince the FAA that it’s okay, then it can be implemented.
The rules refer to “approved seats or berths” as seats as the language progresses and they start to detail exclusions and exceptions, but again, this does not exclude something that conventionally isn’t a chair from being labeled as an approved “seat”
https://www.insider.com/skyrider-standing-airplane-seats-claims-makes-flights-cheaper-2018-4
There is an example, notice how they still refer to them as seats. My point isn’t that it will or won’t happen. My point is that the language doesn’t outlaw it as currently written. And you’re wrong for trying to say otherwise.
There is also NO REGULATION that demands airlines actually provide a chair. If they can find something that passes the rules that do exist, that fits more people because it isn’t a chair, and that they think people will suffer through, they will do it.
You need help with reading comprehension and deductive reasoning
That’s the break even point for the environmental benefits to overtake production negatives for evs…what the fuck are you talking about? Of course they last longer then that that’s my fucking point you dipshit
They already do cause less of an impact than ICE powered cars. Anyone can Google the information that shows that even though battery production is unclean, fossil fuel production over the life of a car is worse.
If the EV last for more than about 5 years, it was worth it.
Nuanced political discourse will not be tolerated on the Internet.
My bread last so long because I twist and tuck in a bread box.
Yeah that’s not how ipas work.
How many times do you go to the bathroom in a day you think? Jw