• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 10th, 2024

help-circle







  • Sure. If skin color and ethnicity is the deciding factor of who to hire, then it’s “almost always a good thing.”

    But it’s not racist.

    The fact that DEI has to become a policy is sad in and of itself.

    I just don’t understand how a person can be proud of being hired based on a policy rather than being hired because they’re the best qualified individual.

    It just doesn’t seem to solve the bigger problem of education and opportunities. And availability thereof.

    Meh it’s alright. Just a policy that white people created so they can tell themselves that they’re not racist. Which is why you had to state it yourself.




  • This is how I feel, actually. Free education and paid training can rule out the need for any DEI initiatives, no matter what color/ethnicity, they’re qualified because they received the education and training that they need.

    But then again, I can understand why a white manager would rather hire a white person.

    But whose to say a black manager wouldn’t do the same and just hires black people. Or any race. Wouldn’t you feel more comfortable with like minded people rather filling up your store with “diverse employees” ?

    It’s a crutch that MOST people have. Like leftists only hiring leftists. Or conservatives only hiring conservatives.

    Like you said, if the “diverse employee” is less qualified than his white counterpart, hire the more qualified individual.

    If you’ve ever visited any VA hospital, you can see how many shitty people they hire, especially when half of the doctors are just interns. And no one gets fired.




  • Hiring a lesser qualified individual to satisfy DEI policy is flawed and creates a weaker product.

    Improving education and wages would fix the need to hire based on “DEI” individuals. Making education cheaper to attain while providing higher paying jobs, so everyone has a chance to further their education and opportunities.

    There are a lot of jobs that only men are inclined to do that women simply don’t want to do. Forcing companies to hire people who can’t do the job properly just for them to quit or be fired isn’t good practice.

    DEI policy is just a band aid to cover up the real problem. You’re just looking the other way because you think it makes you feel moral and just to advocate for said polices. Your “advanced degree” has made you complacent with today’s societal standards.

    Don’t you want all people to have the same opportunity that you had? Why should a company hire a POC with a GED ahead of anyone else to satisfy a policy?

    Why should a labor intensive company be forced to hire someone that will eventually quit anyways? Or be forced to deal with a substandard service to qualify a quota?

    It’s a stupid flawed practice. Look at Cheatle with the secret service. Perfect example. She was definitely the wrong person for the job. Look at Kamala Harris. Look at Ketanji Brown. Biden hired exclusively to DEI standards. Where is Biden now? And look what happened.

    It’s ok to disagree. It’s also ok for a woman to choose motherhood over a career. It’s ok for a man to be the provider while the mother takes care of the household and children. It’s also ok for a dual career household. Beliefs shouldn’t be forced into others. Especially religious beliefs.

    Take care, thanks for the reply.





  • Just like Biden pardoning his son while he’s clearly guilty of the charges. Hunter is not being politically hunted, like say, Trump. Who knows if Hunter forced Biden to pardon him or else he’ll reveal damaging information.

    “Both sides” is always applicable. Democrats caused serious harm to democracy when they attempted to install Harris after they bullied Biden to step down