I believe the answer is “A lot of Americans”.
I believe the answer is “A lot of Americans”.
If this game releases with good quality my friends and I are day 2 customers for sure. Seems fun as hell from the videos.
Yeah, I like them but I’m firmly in the camp of waiting for player reviews. We’ll see.
With his ethics there’s no way I’d let any company controlled by him attach itself to my brain.
I have a hard time imagining that for any profit driven corporation, but most especially him.
Yeah you’re right, a divider. Or a 0.x multiplier I suppose.
And you’re also right about the divide between highly skilled and not, but I think that’s what we saw quite strongly in SAO. The side effect of serious consequences separated the players.
I don’t think it’s a successful design approach for a commercial game, most players do not play permadeath even if it’s an common option.
Why is PCMag supporting more Twitter usage? It’s a poison, a platform for mass manipulation.
The underlying threat of serious consequences changed player behaviour, psychologically.
Today gamers throw themselves into monsters with limited regard for consequences, which changes our perception of the encounters.
I wonder what would happen if number of deaths was a tracked stat that acted as a multiplier for player skills / powers.
We demand infinite growth. Why? Because shareholders want to buy shares and sell them later for more.
Do anything it takes to make that transaction happen, cut people’s jobs en masse, whatever.
Forever.
He’s broadcasting to all businesses and billionaires that anyone who strongly supports him gets their back rubbed right back.
He’s not saying EVs are great, that we should support them because it’s good policy, the right move for America etc.
Its simply quid pro quo.
He will transition into a despot and warmonger next, and then move into weapons. Lot of money to be made there.
Sounds like exactly the guy you want owning a huge societal discussion platform and developing brain interfaces.
deleted by creator
This is cool functionality.
Yeah, fully agree. This is one of the reasons big tech is dangerous with AI, their sense of humanity and their instincts on what’s right are way off.
Oozes superficiality. Say anything do anything for market share.
Go after the individuals responsible, the company leadership created a culture which maximizes profits over safety.
By simply fining them we are saying that the cost of human lives can be factored into the cost of business.
Does anyone else notice missing comments here?
There were comments here yesterday.
I thought it was hilarious
There should be consequences for companies (and specifically the leadership) that cause danger to innocent lives in their pursuit of profit over all else.
Making those promises was good for shareholders. Good spin, positive pr, keep share price stable etc.
And then staying in Russia was also good for shareholders. Moves more product. Easy.
So that’s what they do. Shareholder value above anything else, there are no exceptions.
Can’t remember the last time I was on Twitter. Turns out I don’t need it. Turns out I’m just a little happier without it.
The CEO and his management team created this, they did not take care of the workforce, and they cultivated the most recent reputational damage.