You can acquire it through direct contact, i.e. consuming prion-disease-contaminated meat. What would you call it?
You can acquire it through direct contact, i.e. consuming prion-disease-contaminated meat. What would you call it?
I like to think of it like a Mad Cow or Kuru, you can’t eat your own species’s brains or you could get a super lethal, contagious prion disease.
🎶Lemon Pound Cake🎶
That meme sucked
We do get sick of it, but only because it’s always true.
How is “stop worrying about them, they’re pointless” not an opinion on the matter of fingerprint sensors? And how do you know I’m not in high school?
No scanner at all is the cheapest and it’s just as efficient. I don’t use mine so, if it has to have one, I really don’t care where it goes.
Are you prepared to tell the turth, the whole turth, and nothing but the turth?
That’s because it would more accurately be called pumpkin pie spice, since it’s based on the spices that go into a pumpkin pie. I guess it’s just too many words for the general public to comprehend.
Massive ethnic enclaves
What does he think white Americans are? North America was doing just fine before the Europeans came.
I’m more concerned with the drug dealers advertising on TV.
Like with stripes or a big round shell that it protrudes from? Don’t get me wrong, it’s a cool-looking animal, but it would look dumb as hell if someone tried to make a car actually look like one imo. Maybe a spaceship or a deep-sea submersible, but not a car.
Exactly! Let the rest of the world deal with it, it functions properly for me.
I just don’t know why anyone cares, you can’t see the thing when you’re using it anyway.
It’s a car-shaped car, idk what the problem is. Were you expecting tentacles?
Ok, but the output of the aggregator can still be analyzed for bias, right? How often does “Business Insider* yahoo” aggregate right-wing bullshit vs left-wing bullshit vs actual apolitical truth? Knowing the source’s source doesn’t change the veracity of the article, only the contents of the article affect that.
It’s Yahoo, the source is Yahoo. You don’t even have to click it, it says it right beneath the title. Stupid bot.
I don’t need to, I’m not accusing you of slander. 😉
It’s not slander if you can’t prove it’s not true.
I’d like to ignore it until it goes away too, but I don’t think that’s an effective strategy for either issue.