Remember that interview with Don Lemon where Musk got heated over censorship?

Me too.

I mean. They could go with google and most ideally change nothing, or stay with the open source project and try to cut out a slice of the appstore pie for themselves.

Google can only do that if they can maintain grip on the market. This requires the likes of Samsung, who also contribyte to android, to move with them to their then propiatary solution. Google is not going to win this just with their Pixels.

Google closing android would ruffle a lot of feathers so it definitely wouldn’t be a given they would come out of that on top.

Apple has no problem existing outside of Google’s sphere of influence. And honestly if the android market would split and you’d get legitimately google-less phones with large app stores that google doesn’t control that would be fairly beneficial if you ask me.

Trump: starts trade war

Trade partners leave the chat.

Trump: surprised pikachu

If google where to close android it’ll undoubtedly be forked. Pretty sure the likes of Graphene and Calyx will be fine for the forseeable future.

Yeah, agree. Hence the crime against humanity stance.

Data you get from people by using torture is automatically invalid, especially when it comes to getting people to “admit” things.

When are we finally going to consider this the war crime/crime against humanity it is?

The two look like boobs, and the three look like a penis

Due to the fact I’m essentially a 40 year old adolescent i have Olympic gold in seeing penises and (to a lesser extent) tits in everything, but you lost me here…

If this is is the answer it’ll take the cake as most abstract rendition ever.

Tech leaders who once backed Trump

Once, meaning, until about two months ago.

As much as I’d love to take this at face value, people taking a run with what an AI told them is highly problematic.

We don’t disagree I think, but I feel people in general are too blasé about who they allow themselves to be set up against. This is a recurring theme. People with a slightly bigger house or nicer car aren’t the enemy. Nobody who has to show up to work for a living is the enemy. Neither is anybody reliant on social programs.

Cirtainly not as long as we have things like corporations that book millions, if not billions in profit years on end yet have to be bailed out with public money after a few months of pandemic.

Yes, take public transport, from suburbia…

I’m not defending Tesla anywhere, you can cite me where you think I did. Volkswagen and Porsche have well documented actual Nazi history and is therefor precisely relevant here, especially in the context of where I named them. And you need learn to construct a coherent sentence, because I had to read this word chaos no less than three times to make sense of it.

For me this entirely revolves around why why’s and how’s when it comes to how that affects the ethics of it.

With a defense type scenario I’d likely have a hard time looking at myself in the mirror if I just left and essentially allowed my home to be taken.

If we are the aggressor because we stepped in some horrible turd electorally then they chose this and therefore no thanks bye i’ll send a postcard.

This map doesn’t load on my Librewolf browser with Privacybadger which is something I find moderately concerning and why I looked at the source in the first place, so i’m going to draw a line here in drilling down into this pointless discussion if you don’t mind.

Not in the least because you shouldn’t be doxxing anybody in the first place.

That’s BS. But to entertain this, straight from their page source:

DOGEQUEST is the ultimate hub for fans of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to map and explore DOGE related landmarks. We also connect Tesla Motors owners with each other, using our AI-driven networking features.

That’s not how I read this (excerpt from article):

Dogequest,’ the recently launched website which is doxing some Tesla owners and members of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and putting their personal information on a searchable map

You need to look at my reply in the context of the news I’m replying to.

This website is for publishing name and address info of people.

The most innocent thing that can reasonably come from that sort of activism are threats of which you can only hope are just that.

Im not saying to not boycott Tesla. Im saying Tesla isn’t hurt by damaging or destoying someones private property.

But most or all. You don’t need to freaking dox it’s owners to key or even entirely destroy a Tesla…

People don’t need to get hurt or worse over their car. I don’t care what justification you make up in your head for it that is just wrong on all levels.

In her video, Sotomayor said a third flight attendant told her to remove the equipment and said her son would “be OK until we’re in the air at a high enough altitude.”

Are they backed by medical degrees or something that they feel they can make these assertions?