And explained that he was using AI to do a part of the job that needs to be done by humans, because it helps them figure is the solution.

AI slop can be bad but this Bradley doesn’t understand that businesses exist to make money.

This is generally done by making a quality product, not a pile of shit.

You can get awry with selling people shit, if you charge shit prices. But the kind of assholes described in the article are gonna try to sell shit at AAA prices. Then they are gonna blame their team for not AIing hard enough.

Shot in officer involved shooting?

Shot by a police officer.

As I understand it, these sweatshop jobs do resist the standard of living in the areas they are in. The people there don’t have the option to work a job that we would consider good. They work the job we consider terrible, and they get paid more than they would doing other jobs.

To make a moral judgement, we must balance between “terrible working conditions, no protections, maximum wealth extraction,” on the one hand, and “no infrastructure, no job, no money” on the other. Sadly, there is no profit in making the world better for everyone.

Are you using the US or China as your “here?” Because I don’t think it’s quite that bad in the US, but I don’t think anyone blames the voters in China.

Right. They are just gonna let anyone sell anything.

My wife is artsy, and I’m sciency. Maybe we can go into snake oil.

Ah, you forget the alternative. Instead of quicker review, we could just reduce oversight, and remove safety regulations.

In in a similar boat. All I can do is bail as hard as I can.

And older millennials, in some cases.

So the people upset about the wrongdoing can be punished, but the people who wrongdid are not able to be punished?

Fascinating.

No, just read the article. I don’t like to watch videos for informative that can be written down.

Work the extra information, that does make it worse.

In this specific case, I believe he fed it the words. AI generated video, and text to speech, sort of thing.

But I could absolutely see it happening as you describe.

So he wasn’t using AI to make the argument, just to speak his own words, because he mumbles.

While he should have identified this properly, this is the least offensive use of AI generated video I can imagine.

No that’s what the headlines were claiming. Trump was claiming that the judges couldn’t make him did it.

In general, no, you will not be provided services at no cost. If you want to go back to the post office, they will require you to buy stamps.

If you won’t pay cash, then you have to pay data.

I’m sorry, let me explain what I meant by “at all.”

If a brain-dead MAGA cultists mouthbreather might suspect that you are “one of them brown people,” (you’ll forgive me for not using a term more accurate to their actual speech patterns) then you might reconsider. If you’re white, by the standards of people who still fly Confederate flags, you might do ok.

That said, I am given to understand that our immigration system is a nightmare, and expensive. I don’t know which nations might be easier or cheaper, but I recommend anywhere but here.

If you’re Arabic at all, it’s certainly unwise, and might be impossible to become an American citizen at this time.

On the other hand, I believe Trump is selling citizenship cards for 5 million dollars.

They probably only concern themselves with assault against people. And they probably don’t consider their charges to be people.

ICE is the new SS.

Thanks for the link.