This is embarrassing
This is embarrassing
Look at these guys. Just look at them.
Which is technically in the bathroom
Blind people smell the paper. Since I learned this, I do it too. Olfactory is a better standard than visual for this.
They found her in a puréed state?
pargnobble
Yogurt isn’t very suitable for sales through the mail
But has steamed kale been approved by the FDA for acid reflux?
Perhaps what you’re doing should be made illegal, for safety reasons.
Marketing is ensuring your product offering matches what people want.
I don’t see how an influencer pushing a particular probiotic product fits this
That’s what OP has done; that’s what we’re seeing in this screenshot.
The back button is highlighted. This list is the list of options OP gets when he right clicks the back button.
As the screenshot illustrates, the redirects have been repeated many times to thwart that strategy.
Sounds like the plot of a 90s video game
The push to require paying to read content that is shared openly on the web is designed to drive a feasibility wedge between large and small operations.
It means that a small handful of organizations will actually have the funds to be able to buy enough training data, and that all other smaller AI ventures will be illegal.
This is designed to concentrate AI power into a few hands.
Think critically about the narratives being fed to you. AIs must be allowed to read the web, because if they are not then we will have a unipolar AI ecosystem and the future of humanity will be extremely dark.
We need a multipolar AI ecosystem and the only way to do that is to have lots of small players making their own AI.
If we have a multipolar AI ecosystem, then AI will be forced to play nice because of the effects of parity, and therefore AI will develop along a prosocial, negotiating, respectful path.
Unipolar AI will be tyrannical, cruel, and evil. Unipolar AI will be the result of making it illegal to train AI on web content.
Please see past the propagandistic narrative. Today it is OpenAI that is fighting for this right. Tomorrow it will be smaller players. That is a good thing. That is what we want.
I propose that when abusers are found to have caused a wrongful death, they are put to death in a slow and painful way. For example we could feed them to ants.
Nobody’s freedom is being impinged upon by banning them
Actually yes, the freedom to use those applications is infringed by banning them
Ah, that makes sense. I hope I didn’t offend you by asking that.
Can you provide a quick summary?
but we’re talking about people who attempted a coup here, these aren’t hypothetical pre-crimes
We’re talking about the entire country of Brazil — 200 million people — being cut off from using X.
Keep trying my friend! I would have been moved out of there with a wheelbarrow.