Why do you think the article is upset at Vance? He should have said “We borrow money from them to buy the things they manufacture.” Mentioning ethnicity or the word peasant is clearly racist. Even if he wanted to drive it home, he could have said “We borrow money from these victims of slavery…” but it wouldn’t have made any sense of course that way. It was racist.
Right but it’s a nicer word to use imo.
They are victims, not “peasants” or “serfs”.
What other reason would tech billionaires and CEOs care to spy on you? They bought everything else, they have a privacy fetish obviously.
And the engineers who work there too.
They are pretty conservative now though. It sounds liberal but they slip misinformation and doubt in to make everyone more moderate. Plus sensational claims that lend credibility to right wing critique. That shit works like a charm on my parents, they’ll say “we hate Trump. But you have to admit Joe Biden wasn’t fit for office, he had classic early dementia… Kamala just didn’t seem experienced enough”. They voted Democrat but there’s more doubt and misinformation now, they’re smart people too ☹️
Misinformation is one helluva drug.
“You’re so stupid, do you only look at charts? There’s a lot more to it than data, Trump is making decisions you can’t even comprehend. You don’t understand the greater plan, you can’t always be nice to other countries, we can’t bail out Canada and Ukraine if we want to be great.” Probably that from the “smarter” ones, blank stares and drooling from most.
In 20 years after all journalists are fired or leave, The Onion will be the only news outlet left.
There is a precedent for lawlessness. Literally anything is constitutional now, you just do it and ignore the court ruling. Where have you been the last decade?
Agreed the problem was baked in during the Ohio Compromise and at other times, it has nothing to do with population size because we’re talking about a small number of elites, not popular will.
This IS what fighting back looks like. It takes many forms.
Upvoted for honesty lol.
Somehow I doubt allowing it actually meaningfully helps the situation. It sounds like an alcoholic arguing that a glass of wine actually helps them not drink.
Let’s just make it 0 already, get it over with.
I’m wondering how that stacks up to human drivers. Since the data is redacted I’m guessing not well at all.
It’s only ok to murder if you’re a Republican. That legal precedent was set when Jan 6ers were pardoned. His crime is not murder, but not being a MAGA. The punishment is death.
No it’s not wrong because he’s innocent until proven guilty. Please abstain from being in any jury in the future, for all our sakes.
Was it wrong for YOU to kill a defenseless person?
Right, he worked 1 hours, then 2, then 3, then 2.5, then (1, then 2, … (…)) without any breaks!
Not your fault that the Internet is full of casual misinformation. None of us are immune from that.
Maybe normalize bringing a camera then? Photography is not banned.