Yes, but the other countries that buy from elsewhere will want their normal amounts too.
Can other food producers increase their production while the US spirals down? Nobody really knows, we are in shock due to both global warming and the war in Ukraine. And the US is a really major food exporter.
Can people make do with less food? Probably, but it’s not trivial.
Anyway, China’s tariffs are completely self-imposed. They can cut them at any time.
Yes, as you said, they aren’t a new concept. We have plenty of evidence, of countries that tried that again and again. We know what he is doing is stupid.
Besides, your theory on tariffs won’t even get to be tested. Kidnapping people at random on the street and sending them to concentration camps has an overwhelmingly larger impact on the economy than the tariffs. People from outside of the US will only focus at this if you start to invade other countries, but at this point, nobody inside the US should be concerned with tariffs, at all.
The problem is that China can live very easily without American goods
A lot of it is food. They probably can, but it will not be not easy at all.
Hum… Have you missed the entire OP’s joke?
Oh, to have both the realization that everybody is a complete moron, and the urge to punch them because of it…
On the context of a node package, I’m pretty sure that “solution” is utterly worthless and doesn’t come even close to targeting the same functionality the old code had.
But odds are the one place the library author used that function can be replaced by a completely different functionality that happens to use the suggestion.
It’s a very C++ thing that the language developers saw the clusterfuck that is stream flushing on the kernel and decided that the right course of action was to create another fucking layer of hidden inconsistent flushing.
I see. So you are ready to try the “increase all costs” route now…
Not officially, no.
But yes, it’s already here.
AFAIK, most low added-value products the US net exports are food. Also AFAIK, Canada mostly doesn’t buy those, but the countries that do buy them won’t just stop.
Well, yes, wages tend to decrease on that shift.
At least Brazil has tariffs large than that already. I doubt he will decrease them.
The effects of widespread tariffs is well known.
You will lose industry that makes high added-value products, and increase the production of products with low added-value. (Most people call this “deindustrialization”.)
Tariffs mostly don’t impact the overall trade balance, so there’s no reason to expect that one to change.
Hum… I didn’t know who he was…
Interesting, he seems to have gathered the most control over TNG at the same time the series became really good. He kept the tradition of making not-really-good movies, but then I’m not sure I can complain about that.
IMO, there is also too much crammed there.
You either have large politics, centered on the Senate, or you have small politics centered on the people. Or maybe it’s missing a movie dealing with the Republic stuff.
Cop goes postal after corporation just letting his mother die and refusing to protect his wife. Goes and pushes for a Nazi coup…
Damn, the story of the prequels is so good, it’s a shame the movies don’t really explore it.
But Tesla stock is 75% hype
It has been adjusted recently, but it was around 99% (P/E of 100 times what other car companies have), so it can’t be lower than some 95% now.
Well, you shouldn’t have to spend any time actually fixing code found by that rule either. If the time you spent was larger than 0, you are better looking for the cause than making something that fixes it automatically.
The GP is saying that String is a class already, you shouldn’t have to call String.class.
Personally, I’m away from it for long enough that I don’t remember either.
If the US manages to reduce their imports, what will probably happen is that the rest of the world will cut the more optional consumption from there so that they can keep buying the food. What means that US industry will suffer.
But your first feeling that sellers and buyers will redistribute who they deal with is probably correct too. Anyway, the tariffs shouldn’t have an immediate effect of changing how much food moves around, but nobody knows what domino pieces they will hit on the fall.
On the very short term, China is tariffing stuff that hurts. What means they are serious about not buying from the US and will pay extra for the privilege. And yes, also means somebody else will probably take their place.