Reports should not downrank posts. It should notify moderators. Moderators can decide to add a mod comment, hide the comment, delete the comment, message the commenter etc. There can be tools under moderators control to automate this.
Reports should not downrank posts. It should notify moderators. Moderators can decide to add a mod comment, hide the comment, delete the comment, message the commenter etc. There can be tools under moderators control to automate this.
I do agree if it were not a single button the likelihood would be much further less. I would imagine ideally one tap to open a modal window and then one tap between ‘This is spam’, ‘This is harassment’ or type in Other : []. So maybe just moving the Create Report to where downvote button now is worth trying.
There is a fundamental difference between YouTube and Lemmy though - community members and community moderators. I think having a signal from dislike is much less needed because of it. However, I do think it would be nice (not impactful at the current size of community) to have a viewcount of some sort.
From a user interface perspective, I think it’s far less likely people will report spam than downvote when they do not like something. I suppose we both are only hypothesising here though.
I don’t see offsetting as a good feature. It just seems to drive people into tribalistic up/down wars. What’s the point of users seeing the net votes?
I suppose it makes sense if the change is lemmy-wide
I think it’s better to have a button to report spam, harassment, etc , rather than using downvote. Downvote is too ambiguous.
Maybe they didn’t want to tarnish the copilot brand with risky privacy invasion
would apply to anyone who is a tax resident in France or who has assets in France.
Awesome!
You haven’t started your requirements. If it’s only tinkering for fun and cannot handle editing text files, then best avoid the Linux world.
The bigger ones are great for parties but that’s not an everyday event
Thank you!
Sounds like that episode of yes minister
Rejecting intercessors has not worked out, has it? See Sunni vs Shia.
They stand to gain nothing from making a proprietary platform
Why would that be possible? Wouldn’t the developer have their server rejected any calls from “unsigned” apps?
Cold start is a hard problem for recommendations. It probably shows what’s popular in the nearby locations and/or matching demographics. Why’s it not normal?
Did those using tutor AI spend less time on learning? That would have been worth measuring
Bad headline. Should have titled as ‘AfD is better at promotion on tiktok’ or something of that sort
This is probably makes a good case for open sourcing all governing algorithms
Very true because the relationship they have with laptop manufacturers will ensure windows domination
OpenAI doesn’t attribute the original training data, so not consented?