Donald Trump flirted with the idea of being president for three terms – a clear violation of the US constitution – during a bombastic speech for the National Rifle Association in which he vowed to reverse gun safety measures green-lighted during the Biden administration.

“You know, FDR 16 years – almost 16 years – he was four terms. I don’t know, are we going to be considered three-term? Or two-term?” The ex-president and GOP presidential frontrunner said to the organization’s annual convention in Dallas, prompting some in the crowd to yell “three!” Politico reported.

Trump has floated a third term in past comments, even mentioning a prolonged presidency while campaigning in 2020. He has also tried distancing himself from this idea, telling Time magazine in April: “I wouldn’t be in favor of it at all. I intend to serve four years and do a great job.”

  • FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    And that’s a big part of why, despite everything Biden is doing, I am 100% voting for him. Because if Biden wins, there will be a 2028 election where we can hopefully find someone better, and I’m not convinced that there will be under Trump.

    Four years of Trump came really close to turning this country into a kakistocratic dictatorship. I really don’t want to give him another chance.

    • jettrscga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      Despite what that Biden’s doing exactly? I’ve heard about Israel weapon sales that are now being forced through by republicans as well. What else?

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        64
        ·
        6 months ago

        Why don’t you use those pointless keystrokes you used to ask that question and redirect them to a search engine and ask a question about what the accomplishments of the Biden administration are? Do you need to be spoon fed like a baby?

        • stratoscaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Why not educate someone who is earnestly asking? There is so much information and misinformation, just typing “Biden Israel” into Google and expecting full context is hopeless.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s a very true thing. The problem with search engines anymore. There’s so much money in propaganda and misinformation. Getting on and finding real information as opposed to false information can be a daunting task.

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            35
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Because someone asking here has probably already read what the administration has accomplished and is asking it rhetorically rather than out of any desire for genuine conversation. This is the News community, if you’re here and only reading the negatives it’s a personal choice. And “Biden Israel” isn’t exactly the sum of the administration, is it?

            • Xanis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              Guys, I think this guy works in News /s. He’s being sensationalist, isn’t actually answering any questions anyone is asking, is focusing on the bad, and is seemingly reaaally determined to get a rise out of someone.

        • jettrscga@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You fully misunderstood my stance. The person I responded to said “despite everything Biden is doing” as if he’s created other controversy. I was asking what that controversy is.

    • retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Why on earth would ypu think democrats would allow for someone better in 2028? Biden’s win will prove that they can continue propping up fascist extremists and you’ll vote for fascist lite.

      You’re not describing a strategy, you’re describing a slow death.

      • FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Even so, still better than a perpetual Trump dictatorship.

        If Trump wins, he will, without a doubt, try again to end American democracy. He did before. And whatever you think of our current situation, at least we have a fucking voice right now.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      6 months ago

      there will be a 2028 election where we can hopefully find someone better

      I’ve literally had people utter this to me before every single presidential election that I’ve voted in and it’s never come true. Neither party has any incentive to improve things when they’re guaranteed to get votes because “the other guys are boogeymen!”

      • FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        So when Trump pulls another January 6, but succeeds this time and declares himself president for life, do you think that will make the situation better or worse?

        • acetanilide@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          My concern is that he will run again and again until he dies. Ideally if he won this year he could never run again. Obviously he’s a fascist so he will probably try to stay in (again) but man I am not looking forward to the next 20-50 years of him. And I’m guessing he’s going to live forever at this point.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        There are generally better things happening under democratic rule than republican rule. I get that it can feel small to those of us who want more radical change but there is a difference.

        But I agree. Radical change is probably not happening from within the current system. Direct action and external pressure will be needed. But there is still a difference in how tolerant the two parties (and also between intra-party factions) will be of such a movement.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Donald did do an insurrection on his way out in 2021. Oh, did you not vote in 2016? Maybe you are technically correct.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Trump can’t be both “different from everyone else” and “everyone’s worries about the guy are unfounded, he’s just another politician.”

        While I know you didn’t say he’s the same, per se, you might as well by comparing alarms that Obama or Romney are going to be forever presidents to the guy literally “joking” about being a forever president that’s taken possibly criminal steps to subvert the results of an election already.

        It’s not just the fringe paranoid folks saying “this could be the end of democracy as we know it if Trump wins.”

  • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The same guy who unilaterally banned bump stocks with an executive order being hosted by the NRA shows how much the NRA actually cares about the second amendment.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Are you claiming the “take the guns first” guy isn’t a strong 2A supporter? Say it isn’t so!

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Bump stocks and all other focuses on rate of fire are more or less a sacrificial lamb. It provides a strong distinction between “Heh, stupid fucking loser thinking ‘assault rifles’ are actually a thing” and “semi-automatic versions of rifles specifically designed for and used by military forces”

      When the reality is that basically every military strong discourages the use of full auto by anyone whose job is not to carry a machine gun of some form. But, because that AR-15 you bought at Walmart doesn’t have full auto, it isn’t a military weapon.

      And because it is our god given right to carry an m249 everywhere we go, it is a horrible insult to the gun nuts of the world to lose their full auto capabilities so we should all feel warm and fuzzy and stop trying to stop kids from getting shot.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        That’s because full auto rifles*, are typically seen as wasting limited ammunition. A modern military unit isn’t likely to encounter a bunched together group of 30-50 soft targets where a full auto rifle would be most effective…unlike a mass shooter indiscriminately targeting a crowded concert.

        *Rifles, not machine guns. I’m well aware of the utility of squad machine gunners, talking guns, etc.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          First off: modern militaries DO get some nice mass executions a lot more often than one would expect. Well worth doing some reading up on that.

          Second: Automatic fire is still horrible for that. If your bullets have a high degree of penetration then you are, generally mortally, wounding multiple civilians per shot and are better at aimed shots at clusters of women and children. Or your bullets don’t have a high degree of penetration and you mostly just light up one or two kindergartners whose corpses take up most of the shots. At which point you are, again, better off at firing off a bunch of snap shots.

          Third: The actual reason militaries have automatic weapons is for situations where aiming is difficult or less important. Machine gunners at the squad level are expected to fire very short controlled bursts (otpimally single shots) to actually suppress a target when trying to “keep some heads down” so that the maneuver group can flank. Or they are engaging at significantly longer ranges (which is why machine guns often have a larger caliber round than the rifles) where a short burst increases the likelihood of hitting a target. And while it is mostly out of favor, many infantry rifles had burst fire capability or even simultaneous fire capability (either with two barrels or a ridiculously high rate of fire burst) to increase the likelihood of infantry hitting a target by spending more on ammo than training (before realizing it significantly increases the cost of the weapons AND requires more training so that the high schoolers can maintain their weapons in the field). But modern optics, and a decade or two of being the only people with NVGs, rendered that obsolete.

  • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    6 months ago

    “If the Biden regime gets four more years, they are coming for your guns,” Trump railed.

    Really pulling out the “greatest hits” with this piece here. He’s got nothing else.

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The only time we elected a president more than twice, it was a Socialist, and he was so popular that we had to pass a law after he was elected a fourth time so it didn’t happen again.

    Edit: fixed!

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The only time we elected a president 3 times, it was a Socialist

      FDR was elected to four terms. He died 85 days into his fourth.

      and he was so popular that we had to pass a law to keep him from being elected a fourth time.

      The 22nd amendment wasn’t even drafted until after FDR was dead, and wasn’t ratified until 1951. And the language of the amendment specifically exempts the president at the time of ratification. The 22nd Amendment wouldn’t have stopped Truman from running again, let alone his predecessor.

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            You got downvoted too, lol.

            People in Lemmy can be odd. I’ve noticed that, once in a while, I may pick up a stan. After a possibly terse exchange, I’ll see all comments/posts have, like, as single downvote for a few days.

    • BigFig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      FDR was a Social Democrat not a Democratic Socialist. Similar but very different

    • Sunforged@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      FDR was not a socialist and the New Deal was a compromise from the existing capitalist power structure in order to harness and then diffuse the growing socialist energy in the country. It’s a huge reason the New Deal focused so much on highway expansion instead of public transportation.

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    6 months ago

    So let’s see here, Trump is 77 years old, but will be 78 at the time of election. Let’s just add eight years and we get 86… yep he’s angling for president for life.

  • Alto@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    noted fascist is a fascist, more at 5

    Guys I’m starting to think that this Trump fellow might not like democracy

    • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That would never happen: These brave 2A champions have completely banned firearms from these conventions for security reasons.

    • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s my biggest gripe against the left. Imagine betting your life on a game of football where one side is playing no contact tag rules and the other is playing full lethality death ball rules. We’ll sit here and talk about how they’re not playing fair, but pride parades won’t march with guns. We’ll cry about how horrid it is that they force their religion into our schools but we won’t use the same system to fight it.

      The left will die for their beliefs, but the right will kill for them. Only one of those methods leaves survivors.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        As the saying goes, “go far enough left and you get your guns back.” It’s not leftists clutching pearls over “gun violence;” it’s privileged centrist liberals (a.k.a. MLK’s “white moderates”) doing that.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        His kids lack a great deal of his rizz. DT Jr is too weak, Eric is dumb as dishwater, and Ivanka has the girl cooties that sink every woman Republican candidate for the Presidency.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    PLEASE! SOMEONE SHOOT UP A BUNCH OF 6 YEAR OLDS SO I CAN PRETEND I CARE ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION AGAIN! PLEASE!

    -Pro Life Republicans.

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    Someone asked if Republicans will ever run a candidate other than Trump while he is alive. He has such a strong grip on the party that even if he keeps losing he may remain the R candidate, in 2028 and beyond.