The man who stole and leaked former President Donald Trump and thousands of other’s tax records has been sentenced to five years in prison.

In October, Charles Littlejohn, 38, pleaded guilty to one count of unauthorized disclosures of income tax returns. According to his plea agreement, he stole Trump’s tax returns along with the tax data of “thousands of the nation’s wealthiest people,” while working for a consulting firm with contracts with the Internal Revenue Service.

Littlejohn leaked the information to two news outlets and deleted the documents from his IRS-assigned laptop before returning it and covered the rest of his digital tracks by deleting places where he initially stored the information.

Judge Ana Reyes highlighted the gravity of the crime, saying multiple times that it amounted to an attack against the US and its legal foundation.

    • awesomesauce309@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Trump and his base already conflate his many court cases catching up to him as the DOJ sent to stop a political rival. If Biden just pardoned the person who “stole” Trumps taxes, we’d hear about it nonstop til November.

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Don’t do something because it might piss of the Republicans is not gonna cut it as an excuse.

        And as we have all seen, they will straight up invent a reason to complain nonstop until November if they don’t have a real one.

        • awesomesauce309@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          The guy chose to commit the crime. The republicans are looking for anything that sticks in their idiot bases brain and “Biden chooses to pardon anti trump criminal” will be on the fox or oan scroll until it’s burned into their eyes. Pardoning is Biden’s option, but if he does, that helps trump with his base in a tight race. Obviously he wouldn’t pardon.

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            How many votes for Biden do you lose if the Fox News viewers decide not to vote for him? Are there many people watching that channel who are on the fence?

            • magnetosphere@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Probably very, very few, or none. I know from a small amount of personal conversations, though, that there are quite a few lifelong Republicans who have absolutely had it with Trump. I don’t think they could bring themselves to vote for Biden, however. They’d just skip voting for President altogether.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        So, what, instead Biden should capitulate to avoid offending them?

        We’re going to hear about this shit nonstop til November anyway, it doesn’t matter if Biden pardons him or not. Might as well earn it.

      • magnetosphere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It would be hilarious if he pardoned him the day he started his second term (not the day after the election, but the day he actually started his term).

        Won’t happen, but it’s fun to dream.

    • AnonTwo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      He really shouldn’t. What the guy did was still legally wrong, and he probably knew it and weighed he would rather take jail time and commit it. A less scrupulous person could do worse things, which is why those laws are in place.

      If he could somehow reduce the sentence that would be great, and if that is on the table he should, but some punishment should still occur.

      He’s a vigilante hero for what he did, but vigilantes are still criminals. The main issue here is that the punishment is clearly wrong, and the message is wrong, as the judge seems to think this is paramount to treason, which it isn’t.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        A crime of conscience is exactly what pardons are supposed to be for - doing what is right regardless of the legality or consequences

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yes, how could we possibly expect the president to pardon someone who did something legally wrong, that defeats the whole point of pardons! /s

        Anyway, have fun arguing that someone who metaphorically ran into a burning building to rescue a baby deserves the maximum any punishment for trespassing, that’s some real good moral reasoning that will build a just society, for sure /s

        e; ftfy

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          deserves the maximum punishment

          I literally said the punishment didn’t fit though.